DRILLING EXTENDS PRIORITY TARGET ZONES AT LINKA
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
17 September 2026
ASX:VKA
vikingmines.com
15-17 Old Aberdeen Place
West Perth, WA, 6005
P +61 8 6245 0870
F +61 8 9322 5230
contact@vikingmines.com
1
DRILLING EXTENDS PRIORITY TARGET ZONES AT LINKA
• Detailed UV logging of holes LKRC0005 to LKRC0017 has identified further wide zones
of visible scheelite at Linka Main and standout intercepts include:
• Combined 22m of visible scheelite over a 24m horizon from 55m (LKRC0005).
• Combined 10m of visible scheelite over a 12m horizon from 70m(LKRC0006).
• 12.2m continuous interval with visible scheelite from 48.8m (LKRC0017).
• 9.9m of visible scheelite from 58.7m (LKRC0016).
• Drilling at Linka continues to intersect zones of strong disseminated, coarse-grained
scheelite (CaWO4) mineralisation hosted in tactite (skarn) over significant widths,
appearing to be the same style intersected in LKRC0002 (14m at 0.56% WO3
i
).
• Scheelite visually identified by Company geologists in RC drill chips by utilising its
distinctive fluorescence under shortwave ultraviolet (UV) light (Figure 1).
• 20 RC holes drilled to date: 14 at Linka Main, 4 at the SW Extension target (including
one abandoned hole) and 2 at the Regional target (Figure 2).
• All samples have now been delivered to the ALS laboratory in Reno, with results
expected to be reported throughout September & October.
• Tungsten pricing remains strong at US$2950/ metric tonne unit (mtu) WO3
ii
Cautionary note: Visual estimates of mineral presence should never be considered a proxy or
substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal
economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities
or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
Figure 1; Photograph under shortwave UV light (254nm) of chip tray from hole LKRC0005. Downhole intervals are 1m. Note 22m interval
highlighted with interpreted visual estimate range of abundance from 0.1% to 1.5% scheelite. Assay results expected in 6-8 weeks.
2
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
Viking Mines Limited (ASX: VKA, OTCID: VKALF) ("Viking" or "the Company") is pleased to
report further strong visual intercepts of scheelite in RC drilling at the Linka Tungsten Project in
Nevada, USA. These additional holes continue to show significant widths of scheelite
mineralisation identified visually through shortwave (254nm) UV fluorescence, including
combined intervals totalling 22m over a 24m downhole horizon (true thickness not yet known).
Viking Mines Managing Director & CEO Julian Woodcock said:
“Continuing to intercept strong and wide visual intercepts of scheelite at the Linka Tungsten Project
is highly encouraging. The drilling is demonstrating the scale of the visually identified
mineralisation at Linka and is validating the historical datasets which made this such a compelling
Project in the first place.”
“With the first assays recently received delivering a spectacular 14m at 0.56% WO3, we are eagerly
anticipating the assays for the visual intercepts being announced today.”
“The US tungsten environment is moving quickly, with the US Government recently restricting the
export of tungsten scrapiii
, and this week committing approximately US$150 million towards
restarting tungsten production in Nevadaiv
. This demonstrates strong government backing for
bringing tungsten production onshore to the US, and Linka is well positioned in Nevada to be part
of that story.”
“We will continue to update the market with regular news flow from the programme as the results
are made available.”
DRILLING
Viking’s maiden tungsten drilling campaign at the Linka Project has continued to intercept
multiple zones of strong disseminated scheelite (CaWO₄) mineralisation hosted within tactite
(skarn), over potentially significant widths. Company geologists have identified scheelite visually
by its fluorescence under shortwave ultraviolet (UV) light (254nm).
Linka Main
To date 14 holes have been drilled at Linka Main, with 3 holes previously reported with visual
interceptsv
(LKRC0002-0004). Assay results have been received and reported for LKRC0002,
which returned 14m at 0.56% WO3 (estimated true width of 9m)i
.
For the remaining 11 holes, visual scheelite intercepts have been observed in 9 and are detailed
below. The two holes without notable visual mineralisation were LKRC0010 which encountered a
3m wide historic mining void and LKRC0008 which did not intersect significant skarn
mineralisation.
Based on the number of holes drilled to date, the Company has had an 86% success rate of
encountering visible mineralisation at Linka Main. This is highly encouraging and further supports
the validation of the historical mining data and potential at Linka.
Details of visual intercepts encountered (with assay results expected in 6-8 weeks) include;
• LKRC0005: Combined total of 22m intervals with visible scheelite occurring over a 24m
horizon from 55m downhole (5m from 55m and 17m from 62m). Estimated visual
abundance ranges from 0.1% to 1.5% scheelite, with multiple very strong responses
throughout.
3
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
• LKRC0006: Combined total of 10m of visible scheelite over a 12m horizon from 70m
downhole (8m from 70m and 2m from 80m). Estimated visual abundance ranges from
0.1% to 1.0% scheelite.
• LKRC0017: 12.2m continuous interval with visible scheelite from 48.8m downhole.
Estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.1% to 0.7% scheelite.
• LKRC0016: 9.9m continuous interval with visible scheelite from 58.7m downhole.
Estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.1% to 0.7% scheelite.
• LKRC0007: Combined total of 9.1m of visible scheelite over an 11.4m horizon from
14.5m downhole. Estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.05% to 0.8% scheelite.
This drillhole encountered historical mining voids for the balance of the interval drilled
and it is interpreted to form one continuous zone prior to historical mining.
• LKRC0009: 3.8m continuous interval with visible scheelite from 57.9m downhole.
Notable very strong visual response with estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.2%
to 1.8% scheelite.
• LKRC0011: 3.0m continuous interval with visible scheelite from 22.9m downhole.
Estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.2% to 1.0% scheelite.
• LKRC0012: Combined total of 5.3m of visible scheelite (in two zones) over a 10.7m
horizon from 28.2m downhole. Estimated visual abundance ranges from 0.1% to 0.8%
scheelite.
• LKRC0015: 1.5m interval with visible scheelite from 110.5m downhole. Estimated
visual abundance ranges from 0.1% to 0.4% scheelite.
Cautionary note: Visual estimates of mineral presence should never be considered a proxy
or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of
principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information
regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
Linka SW Extension
The Company has drilled 4 holes to date at the SW extension (including one abandoned hole).
Two holes have successfully drilled through the younger cover, into limestone and subsequently
into the monzonite intrusive. Whilst no scheelite has yet been observed, the presence of the
contact is highly encouraging and supports our exploration model. The contact between the
limestone and the monzonite is where mineralisation occurs and opens this area to the SW of
Linka Main for further exploration. Further drilling is planned in the prospective area.
Linka Regional Exploration
Two holes have been drilled as part of the regional exploration programme. One hole
(LKRC0013) has successfully tested through the younger cover, into limestone and subsequently
into monzonite. The second hole did not penetrate through the younger tuff into the older rocks,
leaving the area as of yet, untested.
As with the SW extension, this supports the regional exploration model and provides the basis for
further regional exploration. Further drilling is planned across the regional exploration target
area.
4
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
Drilling Update
The drill contractor has temporarily demobilised from site for drill rig maintenance and drill crew
break. The rig is expected to return to site mid-October and is anticipated to resume on a double
shift basis. Based on current levels of productivity it is estimated that drilling will take
approximately 2-3 weeks to complete the programme. Viking will take this opportunity to review
drillhole results and plan additional holes where warranted.
Figure 2; Map showing location of drillholes and respective intervals with visible scheelite under shortwave UV light.
Boxes in orange have previously been reported.
5
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
NEXT STEPS
The Company’s near-term workstreams for the Linka Tungsten Project include:
• Completing the company’s maiden RC drilling programme.
• Reporting drilling progress and assay results to the market as they are received and validated.
• Ongoing metallurgical testwork for both ore sorting and flotation.
• Identifying toll treatment options for the recently approved 900t bulk samples to generate
concentrate for offtake assessment.
END
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of the Company.
Julian Woodcock
Managing Director and CEO
Viking Mines Limited
For further information, please contact:
Michaela Stanton-Cook - Company Secretary
Viking Mines Limited
+61 8 6245 0870
Learn more about Viking Mines via our investor hub here.
i
ASX:VKA Announcement 10th
September 2026: Maiden drilling at Linka Tungsten delivers 14m @ 0.56%WO3.
ii
Source: www.fastmarkets.com 16th
September 2026
iii
Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/06/2026-16078/dpas-directive-allocation-order-and-additional-
requirements-for-recoverable-critical-minerals-and
iv
Source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/elmet-group-secures-450-million-121227284.html
v
ASX:VKA Announcement 19th
August 2026: Viking Drill Wide Scheelite Zones at Linka Tungsten Project.
Competent Persons Statement – Exploration Results
Information in this release that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Julian Woodcock, who is a
Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM(CP) – 305446). Mr Woodcock is a full-time employee of
Viking Mines Ltd. Mr Woodcock has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the
‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Woodcock consents to the
disclosure of the information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
concerning Viking Mines Limited’s planned exploration programme and other statements that are not historical facts. When used
in this document, the words such as "could," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may”, "potential," "should," and similar
expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Viking Mines Limited believes that its expectations reflected in these
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that
actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements.
6
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
ABOUT THE LINKA TUNGSTEN PROJECT
The Linka Tungsten Project is located in Lander and Pershing counties, Nevada, USA, and
comprises three historically producing tungsten mines: Linka, Conquest and Hillside.
Mineralisation occurs as scheelite-bearing skarn developed in limestone along the contact with
granitic intrusive rocks. The mines produced approximately 65,000 tonnes at 0.5% WO₃ through
a 360 tonne-per-day mill up to 1956, when operations ceased in response to the prevailing
tungsten price rather than for geological reasons. Linka's historical mill grade of approximately
0.5% WO₃ ranks among the highest of comparable global tungsten projects.
In December 2025 Viking signed a binding term sheet to acquire a 100% interest in the Project
and is pursuing a brownfields restart strategy that builds on substantial existing infrastructure,
including a 150ft (~46m) shaft, historic pits and underground workings, an on-site ROM pad and
historical tailings dam, and approximately 8.5km² of consolidated mining claims, with sealed
highway within 7km and grid power within 4km. Digitisation of 72 historical drillholes (2,908m)
has extended the known mineralised trend to 1.6km within an interpreted ~7km regional intrusive
contact that remains largely untested. Surface sampling has returned grades up to 14.7% WO₃,
and recent metallurgical testwork has produced a 56.9% WO₃ concentrate at 76.0% recovery
using conventional gravity and flotation. With tungsten designated a critical mineral and the US
REEShore Act mandating Chinese-free tungsten in US military supply chains from December
2026, the Project is positioned to advance towards a near-term, domestically sourced restart.
7
ASX:VKA | vikingmines.com
APPENDIX 1 – DRILLHOLE INFORMATION
8
ASX:VKA, OTC:VKALF | vikingmines.com
APPENDIX 2 – JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1
JORC Table 1, Section 1 – Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as downhole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
RC chip samples are collected at the drill rig during the drilling process. The full drilling interval is
collected from the sampling system on the drill rig into plastic bags. The sample is sieved to collect a
portion of chips for geological logging. The chips are subsequently lamped using a shortwave UV light
(254nm) to assess visually scheelite content.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
RC sample recovery is monitored for excessive sample loss and recorded to ensure sample
representivity.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples
from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that
has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types
(e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information
RC drilling is used to obtain 1m, 2.5ft or 5ft sample intervals. No laboratory analysis has yet been
undertaken (for holes referred to in this report unless otherwise stated) and this report outlines visual
estimates from the RC chip samples collected.
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling is being utilised.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
RC drilling recoveries are visually estimated and recorded as part of geological logging and sampling
process and is estimated as either Good, Fair, Poor or No sample.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
RC drilling sample recovery is monitored to ensure representivity of the samples. High pressure air
compressors with auxiliary boosters and compressors are used to maximise good sample recovery from
the drillhole. The company monitors recovery using visual estimates and weights of sample recovered.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Not applicable. No assays reported.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
RC logging of all drill cuttings is undertaken. No geotechnical logging has been undertaken. Logging of
RC chips is sufficient to support future studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc.) photography.
Logging of RC chips is qualitative in nature. Photographs are taken of all RC chip trays and sample spoil
piles in the field.
9
ASX:VKA, OTC:VKALF | vikingmines.com
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. 100% of RC drilling is logged.
Subsampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Not applicable.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled
wet or dry.
Splitting of dry samples is undertaken using a 3 tier riffle splitter with the full 1m sample put through the
riffle.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
The sample preparation and sub-sampling techniques are appropriate for this material’s mineralogical
makeup.
Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Sample mass per metre is recorded and any intervals with low recovery or anomalous mass are
investigated.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ
material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Duplicate samples are taken 1 in every 20 mineralised samples.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
The current methods and processes described are appropriate for this style of mineralisation.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
No assay results are being reported.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Not applicable.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of
bias) and precision have been established.
No assay results are being reported.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
Not applicable, no assay results are being reported.
The use of twinned holes. Not applicable, no assay results being reported.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Primary data for drill cuttings, including sample number, depth, colour, grain size, weathering, lithology,
alteration, rock fabric and the presence of minerals potentially related to mineralisation are collected in
the field and entered into a spreadsheet which is then uploaded into relational (Maxwell Datashed)
database. Data is managed using the company’s sharepoint system and sample information is recorded
into notebooks at the time of sampling.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No assay results are being reported.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and downhole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
The collar positions have been initially measured using a handheld GPS with an accuracy of +/-5m (z).
Upon completion of the drilling programme a differential GPS (accuracy +/- 0.5m) will be used to
accurately obtain the collar coordinates. The downhole azimuth and dip are surveyed using an Axis
Mining Technology Champ Gyro tool with an accuracy of +/- 1 degree for the azimuth and +/-0.1
degrees for the dip.
10
ASX:VKA, OTC:VKALF | vikingmines.com
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
No MRE is being reported, but the methods being used are deemed suitable for any future MRE
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used. The adopted grid system is NAD83/UTM Zone 11N and all data are reported in these coordinates.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Publicly available LiDAR data from the USGS is at 1m accuracy and considered of a high quality and has
been used to determine the elevation of the samples collected.
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. See map in the body of the report for data spacing of drillholes.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore
Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Not applicable, no mineral resource being reported.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. No sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
At this early stage in the drilling programme, it has not been determined if the intervals are true width or
unbiased sampling has occurred. Due to the steep nature and azimuth of some of the drillholes being
reported, the intervals may have incurred a length bias, however the historical geological information
does demonstrate abrupt changes in strike and dip of the mineralisation. Further work is required to
determine if a length bias is present.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if material.
Drilling dip orientation is variable from -90 degrees to -55 degrees. For hole LKRC0003, a bias may have
been induced, however historical data does indicate a change in dip of mineralisation from sub vertical
to 45 degrees. Further drilling is required to confirm the orientation of mineralisation.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
Samples were collected in the field by Viking geologists and will be shipped to ALS lab in Reno Nevada.
samples are secured and bagged and security is not deemed to be an issue.
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. The Company has conducted no audits or reviews of the sampling techniques and data.
11
ASX:VKA, OTC:VKALF | vikingmines.com
JORC 2012 Table 1, Section 2 – Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
Tenements and location
The USA Tungsten Project Lode Mineral Claims are located in the state of Nevada in the USA. Details of the
Mineral Claims are presented in the table below:
Project State County Type Holder Quantity
Linka Nevada Lander Unpatented
BLK Group LLC 10
Viking Tungsten LLC 91
Alpine Nevada Pershing Unpatented BLK Group LLC 4
Long Nevada Pershing Unpatented
BLK Group LLC 4
Viking Tungsten LLC 12
Ragged Top Nevada Pershing Unpatented
BLK Group LLC 8
Viking Tungsten LLC 30
Terrell Nevada Nye Unpatented
BLK Group LLC 10
Viking Tungsten LLC 56
Victory Nevada Nye Unpatented Kircher Mine Development LLC 8
Third Party Interests
Viking Mines Ltd has signed a binding term sheet to acquire a 100% interest in the project BLK Group LLC
Mineral Claims and currently holds no ownership. Viking can acquire 100% interest in the claims by paying a
total of US$2.88M over a staged 7 year period. BLK group will retain a 2% NSR on all minerals recovered from
mineral claims, and Viking retains the option to buy down 1% of the NSR for US$2M.
Native Title, Historical sites and Wilderness
There are no known registered historical sites over the Project Mineral Claims. The Mineral Claims are
registered with the Bureau of Land Management. The Linka Project has split federal agency responsibility with
the Bureau of Land management managing approximately half of the claims and the US Forestry Service the
other half. All the remaining projects fall under the jurisdiction of the BLM.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
The tenements are held in good standing by BLK Group LLC. To the best of Vikings knowledge, all annual
claim payments are up to date. There are no known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
The US process is to file either a notice of intent or Plan of Operations to the responsible Federal Agency to
obtain permits for drilling. The Company does not know of any reason why these permits would not be
granted once the process if followed and the required bond payment made.
Exploration
done by other
parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
Linka Mine: The area was staked in 1941 by Steve Linka of Austin, NV. In 1943-44, the mine produced 2,420
tons of ore averaging 0.69% WOз. Consolidated Uranium Mines purchased the property in 1953, sunk a
vertical shaft to 210 feet and drove approximately 1,000 feet of drifts and cross-cuts on the 150’ level.
Additional production included; 4,000 tons of ore averaging 0.98% WOз between 1951 and 1956 and 60,000
tons averaging 0.40% WOз between 1955 and 1956. The mine closed when the Government buying program
ended. Mine workings include a 100’ X 50’ open-pit 25 feet deep, a 210’ shaft with approximately 1,500 feet of
drifts and cross-cuts. Shrinkage stopes extend from the 150’ level to the surface (Stager and Tingley, 1988).
In 1951, the Linka Mine was optioned to Hugh Chesser, Reno, NV. Hugh Chesser estimates shipments to
Metals Reserve Corporation during WWII totalled 2,673 tons averaging 0.72 percent WOз.
12
ASX:VKA, OTC:VKALF | vikingmines.com
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Cache Creek Exploration held the properties in the early 1970’s and conducted geological and geophysical
programs. Duval Corporation optioned the properties in the mid-1970’s, did geological studies but no drilling.
Min-Ex drilled the property in 1977-78, with a total of 73 drillholes recorded (eight DDH and 64 wide-spread
percussion drillholes). Note: Not all drillhole locations have been established, with 69 holes digitised and 1
hole estimated (total 70) and three percussion holes with unknown location. Exploration activity completed by
Minex included drilling, surface and underground geological mapping and sampling, minor geophysical
magnetic survey with 10,400 linear feet collected (inconclusive results), 6,500ft of bulldozer trenching and
mapping.
Stager and Tingley, 1988 estimate total production at the Linka mine at 25,670 units WOз (1943-56).
Linka-Conquest Mine: The mine was discovered in 1941 but did not start production until 1943 when Gale
Peer sunk a two-compartment inclined shaft to 130 feet. Workings off the shaft were at the 50 and 100 foot
levels. During WW II mined and shipped 390 tons of ore averaging 2.7% WOз. Additional shipments after the
War averaged over 1.0% WOз, but the tonnage is unknown. Last work on the 100’ level exposed a zone 40’
long, 12’ to 20’ wide, open to the northeast with a grade of <0.4% WOз. Stager and Tingley, 1988, estimate
total production at 5,208 units WOз (1944-56).
Stager and Tingley, 1988 estimate total production at the Conquest mine to be 5,208 units WOз (1944-56)
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation
Linka Project: The area is underlain primarily by sedimentary rocks; it includes an outcrop of massive
limestone of Ordovician age (Upper Plate) overlain in thrust contact by chert and shale of Ordovician Vinini
Formation (Lower Plate). The limestone is intruded locally by granitic rocks of Jurassic age, and the tungsten
deposits occur in the limestone along the granite contact (Stager and Tingley, 1988)
Linka-Conquest Mine - Granite intrusive rocks (Jg) and aplite dikes intrude cherts, shales and limy members of
the Vinini Formation (Ov) in the Upper Plate of the Roberts Mountain Thrust. Scheelite-bearing skarn formed at
the contact.
Miocene age Bates Mountains tuff (Tbm) covers any extension of the mineralization to the northeast.
Linka Mine – Scheelite occurs in lenses and tabular masses of skarn at the contact between Ordovician
Antelope Valley Limestone (Lower Plate of the Roberts Mountain Thrust) and granitic intrusive rocks. The
contact zone is cut by igneous dykes and high-angle faults. Exposures are poor. Granite rocks west of the
contact zone are covered by post-mineral volcanic rock and sediments of Big Smokey Valley.
Antelope Valley limestone east of the contact zone is nearly vertical. The contact zone is about 40 feet wide.
Drilling in the 1970’s shows that, at depth, the contact zone may flatten to the east, then steepen.
Scheelite, with traces of chalcopyrite and molybdenite are the only ore minerals recognized.
Linka-Hillside
Share your feedback
Discover